Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds

CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect


Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 5151
Reputation: 266.8
votes: 8

PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:31 am    Post subject: NDP draws fire over CBC conflict of interest Reply with quote

I think this is a lot worse than Justin Trudeau's speaking for a fee.

This is a department of government -- albeit a crown corporation -- paying for representation in the House that makes some of the news they cover. This is particularly the case at a time when so much of the news is coverage of 'pseudo-events', ie, events creates specifically for the media coverage they will get. Idle No More comes to mind -- with its hunger strike that wasn't a hunger strike, the camping out that wasn't camping out, and issues that were pressed forward despite the need to cover up the native malfeasance and misuse of funds.

NDP draws fire over CBC conflict of interest

One of the NDP's strongest advocates for the CBC is being paid tens of thousands of dollars a year by the state broadcaster while voting on the CBC's funding and debating its future.

Liberal and Conservative MPs now say NDP MP Andrew Cash should resign his position on the House of Commons heritage committee for violating conflict of interest rules.

But Cash says the ethics commissioner cleared the way for him to debate CBC funding even though he has earned nearly $40,000 a year for providing music to the popular CBC television program Dragon's Den.

On Sept. 26, 2011, Cash provided a commitment in writing to the House of Commons ethics commissioner and to the clerk of the House of Commons that he "shall not participate in debate or voting at the Standing Committee of Canadian Heritage on matters to do with the CBC in which I have a private interest."

And yet, within a month of making that commitment - and on several occasions since - Cash has not only debated CBC matters, he participated in votes on CBC's funding.

Liberal MP John McCallum said those debates and votes were clear violations of his commitments to the ethics commissioner and to MPs' conflict of interest rules.

McCallum said Cash should quit his committee responsibilities.

"Absolutely," McCallum said Wednesday. "He was correct in going to the ethics commissioner ... but then he goes out and completely breaks his commitment. I think that is a clear case of breaking the rules."

Conservative MP Blake Richards, who just joined the heritage committee last month, agreed with McCallum.

"Mr. Cash should step aside until this matter is settled," Richards said. "Mr. Cash broke his word to the ethics commissioner. We need to know whether he was using his position as an MP to further his own financial interests."

Cash earns $2,426.44 - the union rate - for each new episode of Dragon's Den that airs. In 2011, there were 16 new episodes. That would have netted Cash nearly $40,000 or more than one-quarter of his $157,000-a-year MP's salary.

The issue of MPs earning outside income became a hot topic last week after Liberal leadership candidate Justin Trudeau voluntarily disclosed that he has earned $277,000 in speaking fees since become an MP.

Cash said he relied on advice from the ethics commissioner to allow him to continue to debate CBC issues and be a member of the heritage committee even while receiving CBC royalty cheques.

"As I have extensive experience in the field it was clear to me that I had something to contribute to this committee and, after discussing with ... commissioner, it was also clear I could do so without putting myself in a conflict of interest," Cash said.

"I certainly don't think artists should be excluded from sitting on the heritage committee - just like there's certainly nothing wrong with lawyers sitting on the justice committee or doctors on the health committee."

Cash provided a letter from the ethics commissioner dated Sept. 29, 2011, that appears to contain contradictory advice.

"Your contract with the CBC is considered a private interest and as a result, (the MP's conflict of interest code) prohibits you from participating in debate or from voting on matters specifically related to CBC's funding or plans and priorities that may affect your private interest. If the matter in question is of general application or affects CBC as one of a broad class, you would not be prohibited from participation," ethics commissioner Mary Dawson wrote.

In that letter, Dawson also acknowledged Cash's commitment not to speak about funding cuts at an upcoming heritage committee meeting.

Cash did so anyway, arguing against funding cuts when his committee met Oct. 25, 2011.


Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 7834
Reputation: 312.6Reputation: 312.6
votes: 21
Location: The World

PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am torn on this issue;

Cash is entirely correct that if you are going to have a heritage committee you may gain some benefit from having an "artist" on it.

Being on the committee is something that doesn't bother me, heck even being paid for work he composed prior to becoming an MP is something I have no issue with.

He walked away from his job to become an MP, and the fact that he benefits from the fruits of his prior labours is no different then many many many other MP's.

Where I have a problem with this is that he did inform the Ethics Commish about the conflict;


He apparently committed to not debate are partake in votes on the heritage committee, which is outlined at the end of the linked letter.

Yet he did so anyway.

The fact that Mary Dawson has cleared him of wrong-doing is interesting, however I see no issue with the opposition asking for the standard resignation.

He did exactly what he said he would not do, and if any other MP from the CPC or LPC did the same they would be held to the same level of scrutiny.

Welcome to the big show NDP, your MP's are finally being held accountable in the same manner the Liberals and CPC have been held accountable for years.

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1


Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

NDP draws fire over CBC conflict of interest

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB