Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds


CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect



Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 28, 29, 30, 31  Next  

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 29 of 31
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Do you think it's an important 'right' that you can obtain "the personal opinions or views of an individual employed by a government institution given in the course of employment" …as it relates to you?
Yes
51%
 51%  [ 40 ]
No
48%
 48%  [ 38 ]
Total Votes : 78

Author Message
Bugs





Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 2356
Reputation: 162.9Reputation: 162.9
votes: 6

PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What have you learned from the experience?
don muntean





Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2262
Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9
votes: 8
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bugs wrote:
What have you learned from the experience?


Hmmm...which experience? The still as yet unresolved implanting or - the 10+ years futile endeavor to get rights, justice and closure...in socialist Canada?
Bugs





Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 2356
Reputation: 162.9Reputation: 162.9
votes: 6

PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 10:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The-struggle-against-faceless-bureaucracy part.

Kafka wrote a book called The Castle which seems to describe a similar experience. It was made into a movie.
don muntean





Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2262
Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9
votes: 8
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

don muntean wrote:
don muntean wrote:
NOW OVER 86000 VIEWS!!!


Now over 87000 views! Seems that this topic is still being read! I hope that government notices...


Well it's now 90100+ views!!
Bugs





Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 2356
Reputation: 162.9Reputation: 162.9
votes: 6

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.amazon.com/The-Cast.....the+castle
don muntean





Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2262
Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9
votes: 8
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

don muntean wrote:
In connection to the 'implant' issue of June 05, 2002 in Cathedral Dental Center I'm forced to continue to make these boycott calls.

Today I called and Katz gave the phone to an uninformed 'colleague' at the Lewvan Clinic - where she is manager [and likely part owner].

So this guy [with a strong south Asian accent] was claiming to be a "psychiatrist" - he made quite a number of pathetic and derogatory comments. Why the continued fixation on trying to convince me that I'm crazy?! How pathetic is that!

Anyway the alleged doctor [who is really a podiatrist] blurted out - "you deserved what she did to you" - then he all of a sudden had nothing more to say!

Mrs. Katz just cannot bring herself to tell the truth - yet.

I had TWO x-rays by two independent medical professionals and their implant was found in my left maxilla sinus.

I'm telling the truth and it is disgusting that this Charter of Rights and Freedoms violation remains UNRESOLVED after nearly 10 years.

The LAWFUL boycott will continue until these miscreants do the right thing and resolve it. They better give up all their false profiling and the nasty comments - trying to bait me to become angry/nasty - I'm as steadfast as can be and I will NOT become nasty nor angry.

God bless the Moose Jaw Police Service/Sask Justice - for not interfering in this lawful boycott!!!



The boycott calling of wascana dental in Regina has resumed. Thank God for Google Phone! How long before Falconer can manipulate the police to come to my door as her order-carriers? Katz was able to get them here >the day after< Mom's funeral This time...we'll end up in court. I think a judge will see the impossibly hopeless nature of getting closure out of them people.

http://spyimplants.webs.com
don muntean





Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2262
Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9
votes: 8
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bugs wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/The-Castle-Oxford-Worlds-Classics/dp/0199238286/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1353164351&sr=8-2&keywords=Kafka%2C+the+castle


Yeah they made a movie:

...A new breath of hope comes with the surprise arrival of Lawrence, who reveals himself as a retired Queen's Counsel. Lawrence has taken an interest in the Kerrigans' case...

[from wikipedia]

Only for me in this real life nightmare - there is NO such hope....no qualified and principled lawyer to force this issue. In this case - truth is worse than fiction.
Bugs





Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 2356
Reputation: 162.9Reputation: 162.9
votes: 6

PostPosted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You must feel very alone and vulnerable ...

In my experience, once qualified professionals make an official definition, it sticks.

Officials respect the opinions of other officials ... as far as officials are concerned, all the rest of us just spout hot air, just gossip and hearsay.

Even if you got an equally qualified professional to come up with a second opinion, it won't have much impact.

The reason I mention Kafka is because your experience causes me to see parallels. Some people must think you're crazy, or obsessed, or such. Most people assume the officials are right.
don muntean





Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2262
Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9
votes: 8
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2013 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"One picture is worth 1,000 denials." (Ronald Reagan)


don muntean





Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2262
Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9
votes: 8
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

don muntean wrote:
don muntean wrote:
In connection to the 'implant' issue of June 05, 2002 in Cathedral Dental Center I'm forced to continue to make these boycott calls.

Today I called and Katz gave the phone to an uninformed 'colleague' at the Lewvan Clinic - where she is manager [and likely part owner].

So this guy [with a strong south Asian accent] was claiming to be a "psychiatrist" - he made quite a number of pathetic and derogatory comments. Why the continued fixation on trying to convince me that I'm crazy?! How pathetic is that!

Anyway the alleged doctor [who is really a podiatrist] blurted out - "you deserved what she did to you" - then he all of a sudden had nothing more to say!

Mrs. Katz just cannot bring herself to tell the truth - yet.

I had TWO x-rays by two independent medical professionals and their implant was found in my left maxilla sinus.

I'm telling the truth and it is disgusting that this Charter of Rights and Freedoms violation remains UNRESOLVED after nearly 10 years.

The LAWFUL boycott will continue until these miscreants do the right thing and resolve it. They better give up all their false profiling and the nasty comments - trying to bait me to become angry/nasty - I'm as steadfast as can be and I will NOT become nasty nor angry.

God bless the Moose Jaw Police Service/Sask Justice - for not interfering in this lawful boycott!!!



The boycott calling of wascana dental in Regina has resumed. Thank God for Google Phone! How long before Falconer can manipulate the police to come to my door as her order-carriers? Katz was able to get them here >the day after< Mom's funeral This time...we'll end up in court. I think a judge will see the impossibly hopeless nature of getting closure out of them people.

http://spyimplants.webs.com


The telephone boycott of Wascana dental in Regina resumed on November 20, 2012 and - it continues - God bless the police - they have not interfered and - if there is a visit to come then - i will be prepared to go to court and defend my actions.

Amazingly, this time they cannot block the Google Phone, i just wish i wasn't STILL begging for rights in Canada - that were ripped away A VERY LONG 10 years 7 months and four days ago.

Hey it's not like i want to call - actually i have nothing to say to them - the inconvenience of receiving these calls are merely to urge them to at last act properly drop the concealment's and be responsible - there is a better chance of that happening - by not permitting the matter to be forgotten.
don muntean





Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2262
Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9
votes: 8
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This topic has clicked over 95000 views!

The telephone boycott of Wascana dental in Regina resumed on November 20, 2012 and - it continues - God bless the police - they have not interfered and - if there is a visit to come then - i will be prepared to go to court and defend my actions.

Amazingly, this time they cannot block the Google Phone, i just wish i wasn't STILL begging for rights in Canada - that were ripped away A VERY LONG 10 years 7 months and 10 days ago...

It's like a lifetime ago this all began - but be damned if these miscreants will prevail...
don muntean





Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2262
Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9
votes: 8
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

don muntean wrote:
Well this boycott has to take another approach - as the dentist conscripted into the June 05, 2002 procedure - has become complacent in this boycott.

Dr. Falconer and - the [now previous] owner of Cathedral Dental Center have had over 6 years to bring proper closure to this matter, I have given extensive opportunities to do this - I even re-offered complete legal immunity to Dr. Falconer and still she chooses to evade this matter.

Thus, since I do not live in Regina and I cannot physically protest at the Wascana Clinic - I have little choice but to use a phone campaign - to call and remind her office - often - that this matter has gone on long enough and that the dentist can bring it to just closure - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - to resolve the matter...."the squeaky wheel".

Naturally, these calls are not harassment. It should be noted that on the point of 'telephone harassment' s. 372(3) of the Criminal Code uses specific language:

"Every one who, without lawful excuse and with intent to harass any person, makes or causes to be made repeated telephone calls to that person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction."

A specific 'defense' wording is there for a reason. The language of the Code contemplates that there are times an individual might indeed have a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" to another individual/business.

I assert that, under 'these' circumstances, one could reasonably argue having a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" - in connection to a boycott of this business - for a resolution of this outstanding and 'irregular' June 05, 2002 incident.

Further, the consideration of such a legitimate defense comes with application of mens rea, which is a legal concept surrounding 'state of mind' or in other-words 'intent'.

Of course, such so-called "repeated telephone calls" - as part of a boycott are not intended to "harass" - nor even to "alarm or annoy" her and/or her office!

I DO NOT LIKE MAKING THESE CALLS - AS I HAVE NO DESIRE TO COMMUNICATE WITH THIS DENTIST - I SINCERELY WANT TO FORGET ABOUT THIS DENTIST...BUT NOT BEFORE THIS DENTIST TAKES CARE OF HER RESPONSIBILITIES IN THIS MATTER.

I SHOULDN’T HAVE HAD TO ENDURE ‘ANY’ OF THIS – EVEN NOW – I HOPE THAT AT LAST THE NOTED 'AGENCY' SHALL CONTACT ME AND - HONORABLY - SETTLE/RESOLVE THIS LONG-SUFFERING MATTER.


(That was posted Tue Nov 22, 2011 @ 6:17 pm)

So it must be noted that I waited over a year - from the time I got a radiology report and doctor's letter on this matter - there was a whole year from them to at last do the right thing - but instead of at last dealing with this matter - they continued to conceal.

Dr. Falconer and Mary Jane Katz - the [now previous] owner of Cathedral Dental Center have had over 6 years to bring proper closure to this matter, I have given extensive opportunities to do this...

Thus, since I do not live in Regina and I cannot physically protest at the Wascana Clinic - I have little choice but to use a phone campaign - to call and remind her office - often - that this matter has gone on long enough and that the dentist can bring it to just closure - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - to resolve the matter...."the squeaky wheel".

Naturally, these calls are not harassment. It should be noted that on the point of 'telephone harassment' s. 372(3) of the Criminal Code uses specific language:

"Every one who, without lawful excuse and with intent to harass any person, makes or causes to be made repeated telephone calls to that person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction."

A specific 'defense' wording is there for a reason. The language of the Code contemplates that there are times an individual might indeed have a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" to another individual/business.

I assert that, under 'these' circumstances, one could reasonably argue having a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" - in connection to a boycott of this business - for a resolution of this outstanding and 'irregular' June 05, 2002 incident.

Further, the consideration of such a legitimate defense comes with application of mens rea, which is a legal concept surrounding 'state of mind' or in other-words 'intent'.

Of course, such so-called "repeated telephone calls" - as part of an economic boycott are not intended to "harass" - nor even to "alarm or annoy" her and/or her office!

I DO NOT LIKE MAKING THESE CALLS - AS I HAVE NO DESIRE TO COMMUNICATE WITH THIS DENTIST - I SINCERELY WANT TO FORGET ABOUT THIS DENTIST...BUT NOT BEFORE THIS DENTIST TAKES CARE OF HER RESPONSIBILITIES IN THIS MATTER.
don muntean





Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2262
Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9
votes: 8
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 6:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

don muntean





Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2262
Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9
votes: 8
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

don muntean wrote:
...my number REMAINS UNBLOCKED - God bless the police, the Justice Department, the government, Shaw and Google!

They must know by now that there exists NO illegitimate means to bring this lawful boycott to an end...there is only one way to do that and that is SETTLEMENT and CLOSURE.

I'm very impressed by the ongoing and consistent popularity of this topic thread - media focus and public attention - 21st century style!!!


That was February 08, 2012

My 'Google Phone' REMAINS UNBLOCKED - God bless the police, GOOGLE the Justice Department, the government!

They must know by now that there exists NO illegitimate means to bring this lawful boycott to an end...there is only one way to do that and that is SETTLEMENT and CLOSURE.

I'm very impressed by the ongoing and consistent popularity of this topic thread having clicked over 96000 views today - media focus and public attention - 21st century style!!!

God Bless Blogging Tories!
don muntean





Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2262
Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9
votes: 8
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was told by Gary Dickson, the Privacy Commissioner, "in cases like this we usually try for a settlement to the complainant's satisfaction before preparing a report" "they have to make you happy and whole and only you know what can make you happy and whole"

When speaking of a so-called meeting that was to ensue at his office he stated - "bring your shopping list".

Of course that meeting never took place and I was later refused a report [in November 2006] - a report that was already complete [in May 2006] as confirmed in emails [they are posted in this thread] to me from his assistant in May 2006.

Should I not STILL feel cheated?
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 29 of 31

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 28, 29, 30, 31  Next  


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Freedom of Information

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB