Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds


CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect



Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 20, 21, 22 ... 28, 29, 30  Next  

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 21 of 30
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Progressive Tory





Joined: 04 Dec 2010
Posts: 688
Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1
votes: 1
Location: St. John's

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cosmostein wrote:
I find the timing of Greg Sorbara's retirement as an MPP odd;
The Ontario Liberals had a defacto majority with Witmers seat empty, and now they are in a situation where they need to retain a seat and win a seat rather then simply win a seat?

Sorbara may be too old to run for leadership federally (65) but perhaps he will assist someone to do so.


Any idea where he's positioned in the Liberal Party, more of a lefty or on the right?
Bugs





Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 1940
Reputation: 103.4
votes: 5

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Any idea where he's positioned in the Liberal Party, more of a lefty or on the right?


Greg Sorbara is more of an 'operator' than an ideologue. He was CFO of an aluminum extruding firm that was making big money, and came under investigation -- while he was provincial treasurer -- for crimes where the officers of the company skimmed off profits from their own company, through a shifty real estate deal. How he avoided culpability when he was CFO is beyond me. (Well, not really ...)

He was the brains of the first McGuinty term, and showed McGoof the ropes, and never resumed a cabinet position (if I remember correctly) for his second. God only knows what he had going behind the scenes. He was chiefly notable for bringing in an additional tax to fund medicare, in the immediate wake of McGuinty's extravagant promise not to raise them ... He shrewdly offered that his was not a tax, but an insurance premium, but that ran into the ditch when it ran afoul of union contracts that compelled employers to pay for health premiums.
Progressive Tory





Joined: 04 Dec 2010
Posts: 688
Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1
votes: 1
Location: St. John's

PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Garneau will be launching his leadership bid soon, if he can find a "dream team" to run his campaign.
cosmostein





Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 5811
Reputation: 185.6Reputation: 185.6
votes: 19
Location: The World

PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Progressive Tory wrote:
cosmostein wrote:
I find the timing of Greg Sorbara's retirement as an MPP odd;
The Ontario Liberals had a defacto majority with Witmers seat empty, and now they are in a situation where they need to retain a seat and win a seat rather then simply win a seat?

Sorbara may be too old to run for leadership federally (65) but perhaps he will assist someone to do so.


Any idea where he's positioned in the Liberal Party, more of a lefty or on the right?


I think Bugs assessment is pretty spot on;
He is an opportunist first, and a slight right fiscal Liberal second.

However, he is very well connected in the "machine" which makes him a solid asset amongst any potential candidates as a behind the scenes guy.
Progressive Tory





Joined: 04 Dec 2010
Posts: 688
Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1
votes: 1
Location: St. John's

PostPosted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cosmostein wrote:
Progressive Tory wrote:
cosmostein wrote:
I find the timing of Greg Sorbara's retirement as an MPP odd;
The Ontario Liberals had a defacto majority with Witmers seat empty, and now they are in a situation where they need to retain a seat and win a seat rather then simply win a seat?

Sorbara may be too old to run for leadership federally (65) but perhaps he will assist someone to do so.


Any idea where he's positioned in the Liberal Party, more of a lefty or on the right?


I think Bugs assessment is pretty spot on;
He is an opportunist first, and a slight right fiscal Liberal second.

However, he is very well connected in the "machine" which makes him a solid asset amongst any potential candidates as a behind the scenes guy.


It could be quite possible he has been recruited to head up a leadership bid. David McGuinty's would be a good bet.
cosmostein





Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 5811
Reputation: 185.6Reputation: 185.6
votes: 19
Location: The World

PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Progressive Tory wrote:

It could be quite possible he has been recruited to head up a leadership bid. David McGuinty's would be a good bet.


Its entirely possible;
However I suspect baring any major changes in the next few months that many Ontario Liberal MP's may be opting for the job of top Ontario Liberal.
cosmostein





Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 5811
Reputation: 185.6Reputation: 185.6
votes: 19
Location: The World

PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jean Charest anyone?
Bugs





Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 1940
Reputation: 103.4
votes: 5

PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Say whatever, Charest is still a valuable political commodity, not nearly as damaged as Bobbo Rae, for instance (and look where he is, after five years).

He's only about 55.

But he's a Mulroney Progressive Conservative, in the old Quebec mould. A patronage guy. Surely, if you needed a guy to bring into cabinet to give Quebec some 'heft', he'd be on the short list? But (in my judgement) you have to accept the reality of the patronage factor.

Are we sure that's a bad thing?

It's a fascinating question. What is Jean Charest's political value, now that he is not a sitting member of the Quebec National Assembly?

Any thoughts?
cosmostein





Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 5811
Reputation: 185.6Reputation: 185.6
votes: 19
Location: The World

PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think he is a guy who's party still secured 1,361,618 (or 31.21%) in an election that had turnout rumored to be in the 70% range.

For all his "flaws", he is still a popular figure in Quebec with a lot of tread left on his political tires.

His political value (IMO) is still very high, in the same way that I think Mario Dumont could get elected as an MP in Quebec in a heartbeat.
Progressive Tory





Joined: 04 Dec 2010
Posts: 688
Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1
votes: 1
Location: St. John's

PostPosted: Wed Sep 05, 2012 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Would Charest want to be just an MP? Would he want to be a Conservative or a Liberal? If Harper could get him to run for him he'd be an asset around the cabinet table, and could help the party in Quebec. However, if he is now a Liberal would he want to be an MP in the third party or would he have to be leader?
cosmostein





Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 5811
Reputation: 185.6Reputation: 185.6
votes: 19
Location: The World

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Progressive Tory wrote:
Would Charest want to be just an MP? Would he want to be a Conservative or a Liberal? If Harper could get him to run for him he'd be an asset around the cabinet table, and could help the party in Quebec. However, if he is now a Liberal would he want to be an MP in the third party or would he have to be leader?


If Charest wants to join the Tories, it will be as an MP and basically the Quebec Lieutenant of the party out of the gate.

He is only a year older then Harper; so theoretically he has a lot of time left politically speaking.

For the Liberals; I think it would need to be leader or bust.
Because the party would need to mold itself to be more Martin-esk around Charest, and with such a small caucus that wouldn't be too hard to do.
Progressive Tory





Joined: 04 Dec 2010
Posts: 688
Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1
votes: 1
Location: St. John's

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

While the Liberals aren't affiliated with most of the provincial parties, I think just the Atlantic Canada parties, most of them are still centre centre-left parties. As well Liberal parties throughout the country are all in huge problems, I've been wondering if it would be smart for the next leader to reach out the provincial parties and build better relationships? Possibly look at common themes they could start promoting so that they start standing for something. The CPC isn't affiliated with any provincial parties, however a lot of them still support similar ideas and work together.
cosmostein





Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 5811
Reputation: 185.6Reputation: 185.6
votes: 19
Location: The World

PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Have been looking over Deborah Coyne's platform;

"The implementation of a carbon tax, allowing a mix of public and private health care to meet national health care standards, reforming the electoral system, reassessing supply management of dairy products, eliminating tax credits to simplify the tax system, abolishing the Indian Act, and replacing sporadic first ministers meetings with a formal council of Canadian governments"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L.....orah_Coyne

Interesting.
Progressive Tory





Joined: 04 Dec 2010
Posts: 688
Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1
votes: 1
Location: St. John's

PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cosmostein wrote:
Have been looking over Deborah Coyne's platform;

"The implementation of a carbon tax, allowing a mix of public and private health care to meet national health care standards, reforming the electoral system, reassessing supply management of dairy products, eliminating tax credits to simplify the tax system, abolishing the Indian Act, and replacing sporadic first ministers meetings with a formal council of Canadian governments"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L.....orah_Coyne

Interesting.


Some good ideas IMO, they need a candidate to spark a policy debate. Her carbon tax proposal is interesting because she wants the provinces to receive the revenue. I'm not a big fan of tax credits and abolishing the Indian Act sounds good. While I want the federal government to respect it's jurisdiction I also want the Prime Minister to to work with thee premiers more.
Progressive Tory





Joined: 04 Dec 2010
Posts: 688
Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1Reputation: 47.1
votes: 1
Location: St. John's

PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Martha Hall Findlay has supposedly recruited Stephen Carter to run her campaign.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 21 of 30

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 20, 21, 22 ... 28, 29, 30  Next  


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


2013 Liberal Leadership Race - April 14, 2013

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB