Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds


CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect



  

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
hosertohoosier





Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Posts: 13


PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 1:35 pm    Post subject: election promise registry Reply with quote

Does anybody know of a case in history of politicians making their campaign promises a legal contract? It strikes me that this might be a good way of combating some of the "hidden agenda" charges that tend to dog the Conservatives. What I envision is the Conservative Party of Canada signing a legal contract with say, some charity or other group that everybody loves. The contract would stipulate a set of promises that, if not met by such-and-such a date, would result in a 5 million dollar (or whatever) fine for the Conservative Party.

So you could put something like "we will not criminalize abortion or sodomy" in there.

What do you think? What promises would you put in there? Is the fact that people can say "oh but they didn't put policy X in there, they plan on lying to Canadians" too damaging for this kind of scheme to work?
Cool Blue





Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 3130
Reputation: 114.9
votes: 10
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 3:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

in 2003 McGuinty singed a contract with the Canadian Taxpayer's Federation promising to not raise taxes if elected.

After he was elected he introduced a health care tax.

The CTF sued him for breach of contract but the courts ruled that politicians can't legally be held to their word.
Mac





Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 5500
Reputation: 104
votes: 35
Location: John Baird's riding...

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Strange that politically appointed judges would take such a position, eh? :(

-Mac
hosertohoosier





Joined: 18 Oct 2008
Posts: 13


PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That is a bizarre ruling. I suppose a possible other way to do it would be through futures markets. Futures markets often allow people to invest in a number of prospective outcomes, some of which are policy-related. Investing party money in such a market would be a credible guarantee. However, I do wonder if folks are allowed to invest in futures markets they could effect (like could Ron Paul sell short on intrade's "Ron Paul to run as a third party candidate" share and get a windfall).
palomino_pony





Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 539
Reputation: 93.9Reputation: 93.9
votes: 3
Location: Lower Mainland, BC

PostPosted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting idea, but it would suck if a government was contracted to fund a program or cut taxes and if the bottom drops out of the economy (sound familiar) , there is no way that either could be afforded. Then they get sued or have to pay a fine on top that? And good luck trying to find a charity that "everybody" loves.

The hidden agenda card is best fought by delivering good government with good policies. The longer that Harper is PM, the less of an issue that this will be. We saw this in 2008.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

  


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


election promise registry

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB