Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds


CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect



  

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
FF_Canuck





Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 3360
Reputation: 73.4
votes: 17
Location: Southern Alberta

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 2:44 am    Post subject: Margolis shills for the Junta Reply with quote

I know, not terribly shocking. But still ...

Eric Maroglis wrote:
Why did Burma's generals spurn foreign assistance when up to two million of its wretched people were in grave distress?

First, pride. The fiercely nationalistic, xenophobic regime running dirt-poor Burma rejects all foreign influences. Second, Burma's generals claim their 400,000-man army, known as the Tatmadaw, is able to provide all necessary relief. The presence of foreign aid workers would insult the army's honour, risk undermining its unquestioned authority and recall the colonial era. China had similar feelings. Besides, charged the Burmese, who was Washington to talk after New Orleans?


Yeah, he went there. In the second paragraph. At least he's predictable.

Quote:
They also believe that western powers are determined to overthrow Burma's government and seize the nation's natural resources of timber, precious stones, gas and, potentially, oil.


Do 'They'? Or is our humble columnist engaging in a little projection?

Quote:
The generals, however callous and brutal, are not far wrong. "Humanitarian intervention" may be coming to play the same role that "peacekeeping" did in recent years - a way for foreign powers to insert their influence into Third World regions under the guise of good works. Potentially oil-rich Darfur is the latest example.


Yep, I'm sure glad we secured access to all that sweet, sweet Darfur-ian oil. It should help at the pumps. And it'll be great to get all that ... something ... out of Haiti and Cyprus and the Golan Heights...

Quote:
Burma is also wary of international aid organizations. Some, such as the Red Cross, are apolitical and perform splendid humanitarian work. But others have hidden agendas, such as trying to promote evangelical Christianity or left-wing government. Neither Burma nor China wants any part of these professional disaster chasers who use calamities to raise money.

Christian missionaries have stirred up rebellion among Burma's ethnic groups, particularly Baptist missionaries among the Karen.


Omg, Crusaders!!!1!one!11!!

... Unbelievable, that he gets paid to write this stuff.
kwlafayette





Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 6155
Reputation: 156.2Reputation: 156.2
votes: 28
Location: Saskatoon Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, there is a silver lining in that cloud. If foreign aid is just another imperialistic tool, then we can stop giving it! Imagine the boon that will be to the world's poor.

PS. Yes I am serious. In the last hundred years, all the cash and goodies the US has given out in foreign aid, all the UN and charitable organizations in Africa, who has been helped? Which countries have been raised out of poverty? There is something fundamentally wrong with the way we try to help people; it is not working, it never has worked, and the chance that it will start working is very small.
Mac





Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 5500
Reputation: 104
votes: 35
Location: John Baird's riding...

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kwlafayette wrote:
There is something fundamentally wrong with the way we try to help people; it is not working, it never has worked, and the chance that it will start working is very small.

Exactly. The chances of it starting to work as about equal to the chances of pure Communism starting to work.

-Mac
mrsocko





Joined: 29 Oct 2006
Posts: 2463
Reputation: 131.2
votes: 8
Location: Southwestern Ontario

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
There is something fundamentally wrong with the way we try to help people; it is not working, it never has worked, and the chance that it will start working is very small.


In Africa 90% of the people where farmers, until aid in the form of cheap grain flooded the African market and forced them out of business!

Now with grain prices high there is no infrastructure in place to allow these former "farmers" to start farming again so they can benefit from the high prices.

We helped put these people in a position where they are dependent on us and can't benefit from free market conditions which could free millions from poverty. GOOD JOB!!
FF_Canuck





Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 3360
Reputation: 73.4
votes: 17
Location: Southern Alberta

PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree on aid in general, but I don't have any problems with disaster assistance.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

  


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Margolis shills for the Junta

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB