Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds


CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect



  

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
peter_puck





Joined: 15 Dec 2007
Posts: 82
Reputation: 6.6Reputation: 6.6Reputation: 6.6Reputation: 6.6Reputation: 6.6Reputation: 6.6
votes: 1

PostPosted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 1:48 pm    Post subject: Bad global warming science debunked Reply with quote

Okay, try to stay on topic. I am going to try and bring up the anti-AGW assertions that i have seen on here one by one. Many of them seem neat until you look at the facts.

Myth one:
The fact that certain other planets in the solar system are warming is proof that global warming is caused by solar variation and not science.

Evidence
Mars appears to be warming like earth. (or appears to be warming) The other planet is Pluto.

Points to consider:

Why are the other planets not warming ? Should not this increased solar radiation warm all the planets ?

Why haven't the global warming skeptics addressed the many other possible explanations for the climate change on Mars put forward by scientists rather than just ignore the them?. How many mars experts hold the view that the change on the temperature on mars is caused by increased global warming and not something else ?

Why use a very indirect and inaccurate measure of solar output (the ice caps on mars) rather than use data from all those instruments NASA has pointed at the sun ? Is there something wrong with the NASA instruments ? If so, what ?

Why has someone not put this in a peer reviewed scientific paper ? (caveat - it may have been by now, but I can't find a source)

Why has mars continued to warm while solar flare activity decreases ?

And, of course, why doesn't every major scientific society that has formed an opinion on AGW take this wonderful new evidence into account and change their view ?
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

  


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Bad global warming science debunked

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB