| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Do you think it's an important 'right' that you can obtain "the personal opinions or views of an individual employed by a government institution given in the course of employment" …as it relates to you? |
| Yes |
|
51% |
[ 40 ] |
| No |
|
48% |
[ 38 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 78 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:37 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| ...the unimpeded [God bless the Police and the Justice Department!] boycott calling continues today...and - so do the evasions! I do not like making these calls - I find it to be more than distressing - but not as distressing as this 115 month and 15 day implant abuse experience. I know that the day is soon coming - removal of the implant, settlement and CLOSURE! |
|
|
|
 |
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If I understand you correctly (Forgive me for not having had time to wade through all your posts), this dentist gave you an implant and you are dissatisfied with it. Why haven't you gone to another dentist to have it removed? |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| queenmandy85 wrote: | | If I understand you correctly (Forgive me for not having had time to wade through all your posts), this dentist gave you an implant and you are dissatisfied with it. Why haven't you gone to another dentist to have it removed? |
Well if you're not willing to read at least some of the pages to find the context - then why are you commenting? Seems like a waste of time to me.
Of course you're comment demonstrates that you have no understanding of the issues presented in this topic.
If this were about a botched dental procedure - this topic thread wouldn't be here and I wouldn't have the boycott activities/website that I have.
This is about a Charter violation. Read this letter carefully:
Note that it says: "There is evidence of dental metal hardware. There is no convincing evidence of dental foreign body."
So there is dental metal hardware in my left maxillary sinus and it's not a "dental foreign body" [i.e.: a dental appliance]!
So it's not about some dissatisfaction with a dental procedure - because this implant isn't a 'dental' implant....
If you want to know more about who, what, where, when and likely 'why' - then you'll have to read through this topic...at 60246 views - it's by thousands the most viewed topic on this entire forum - would so many people be reading about a failed dental procedure - or something bigger than that?
____________________________________________________________________
What if this surreptitious hardware were outwardly visible and the State were openly inducing it on whomever they chose...for whatever 'undisclosed' reasons they chose...would it then become a public outrage...but if it's only one individual and...the hardware is hidden away from sight...? |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I did read a number of pages, but I still don't understand why you haven't had it removed by another doctor. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| queenmandy85 wrote: | | I did read a number of pages, but I still don't understand why you haven't had it removed by another doctor. |
Sorry Don, I'm up to page 4 and the above question was asked in 2007.
Still reading. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...the boycott calling continues today...and so do the evasions! Tomorrow is another day.
I do feel that settlement and closure are nearer than not...no doubt that Dr. Falconer has little choice now but to deal with this matter legitimately.
It was her choice to perform 'the procedure' on June 05, 2002 and it's now going to be her choice to bring proper closure to the long-suffering matter.
The dentist's long standing legal and other manipulations and motivated evasions haven't been able to exonerate her from this responsibility.
Additionally, her illegitimate contacts within the responsible 'agency' have been [over the years] of no help to her efforts to crush this boycott.
I thank God that she cannot manipulate the police! God Bless them!! Without question there remains no other bogus options to end this boycott - soon she will see that it's time to acknowledge the factual circumstances.
The now former owner of Cathedral Dental Center has to soon take a responsible position as well...I hope she does that. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 5:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
"There is evidence of dental metal hardware. There is no convincing evidence of dental foreign body." |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| queenmandy85 wrote: | | queenmandy85 wrote: | | I did read a number of pages, but I still don't understand why you haven't had it removed by another doctor. |
Sorry Don, I'm up to page 4 and the above question was asked in 2007.
Still reading. |
Hey! Was wondering how your reading went...interesting enough!? LOL! |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| don muntean wrote: | ...the harassment calling continues today...and so do the evasions! Tomorrow is another day.
|
There, I fixed it.
And to answer your question, why I have no other postings on any other discussion? I think the answer is quite obvious. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SGI_Gestapo wrote: | | don muntean wrote: | ...the harassment calling continues today...and so do the evasions! Tomorrow is another day.
|
There, I fixed it.
And to answer your question, why I have no other postings on any other discussion? I think the answer is quite obvious. |
I have an answer for your nonsense posting...
Naturally, these calls are not harassment. It should be noted that on the point of 'telephone harassment' s. 372(3) of the Criminal Code uses specific language:
"Every one who, without lawful excuse and with intent to harass any person, makes or causes to be made repeated telephone calls to that person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction."
A specific 'defense' wording is there for a reason. The language of the Code contemplates that there are times an individual might indeed have a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" to another individual/business.
I assert that, under these circumstances, one could reasonably argue having a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" - in connection to a boycott of this business - for a resolution of this outstanding and 'irregular' June 05, 2002 incident.
Further, the consideration of such a legitimate defense comes with application of mens rea, which is a legal concept surrounding 'state of mind' or in other-words 'intent'.
What is my lawful excuse?
I have NOT been visited by police because it is NOT harassment. I have a solid defense in this connection - Dr. Falconer does not. If you have read this topic you would see that her lies to Regina City Police in the past haven't helped her case.
There is only two ways that I will end this noted boycott - by resolution or alternately by the order of a Judge. They won't be able to get the latter. The truth and the circumstances are a good defense...
Q:
And to answer your question, why I have no other postings on any other discussion? I think the answer is quite obvious.
R:
Well yes it's terribly 'obvious' - you're here stalking me...who are you? |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How much do I have to live on? Some people think I'm sitting on my duff living it up somehow - well I have to share this check stub - indeed SGI and the others must be laughing at me!? How can someone as broke as me live - let alone fight against these injustices in a court - with a lawyer?
I'm NOT looking for a pity trip...just stating the facts. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| don muntean wrote: | [...]
I wager that the baby-faced terrorist Omar Khadr will be again walking the streets of Canada and I'll still be out here languishing with this longstanding abuse of my rights and privacy.
The legal/civil rights of foreign nationals and - even terrorists - carry more weight in Canada than the rights of innocent Canadians...I wonder if our federal government even cares about people like me. |
I was right:
"Unlike Arar, who enjoyed only a fraction of the sympathy and media coverage, Khadr will be coming home to the built-in fan club that he's amassed since his capture."
http://www.torontosun.com/2012.....omar-khadr
Yet here I rot... |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Surely...this cannot be the face of the New Canada?
Last edited by don muntean on Thu Feb 14, 2013 5:12 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Boycott calling continues today...the evasions continue as well - today there have been numerous attempts to block the number [along with the Google Phone that I'm using] and it seems to unblock right away! God IS awesome!
God bless the police, the Justice Department, the government, Shaw and Google!
I really do NOT like to make these calls - I want to bring this entire matter to closure and... I have been left with NO other alternative but to engage this type of Boycott - it was not my choice to have this matter persist for over 9.5 years and I would have it end NOW if it were my choice.
Dr. Falconer has to do the right thing already and resolve this matter - along with the responsible agency [there are other serious rights issues that agency has to settle as well - not just this] - there remains no illegitimate means to evade this - in the words of Saskatchewan's Privacy Commissioner [in 2004] - "they are boxed in".
I pray to God that life can at last move forward - with proper closure. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ...the number REMAINS UNBLOCKED - God bless the police, the Justice Department, the government, Shaw and Google! Looking forward to Monday morning!! |
|
|
|
|
|
