*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.
Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds
CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ---->
  |
|
Page 23 of 30
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Do you think it's an important 'right' that you can obtain "the personal opinions or views of an individual employed by a government institution given in the course of employment" …as it relates to you? |
| Yes |
|
51% |
[ 40 ] |
| No |
|
48% |
[ 38 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 78 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 8:36 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| don muntean wrote: | |
....went to the advance poll today and voted - for the Saskatchewan Party! Of course - we all know that they are the only qualified choice to mange this province! |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| don muntean wrote: | | don muntean wrote: | |
....went to the advance poll today and voted - for the Saskatchewan Party! Of course - we all know that they are the only qualified choice to mange this province! |
A little explanation of this caricature, is the picture saying ‘don’t vote for the NDP because they are the past’ – or is it something else? Well it is something more [or as the case be shall made - less]!
Here is something from the Encyclopedia of Saskatchewan:
“The election of 1944 initiated another long period, of about sixty years’ duration, during which a stable pattern of political activity has become manifest. Political dominance now alternates between two political tendencies: the one side of this recurring contest is formed around the CCF and its successor, the New Democratic Party (NDP), while the other side can be viewed as coalescing behind the leader of whatever political organization seems at any particular time to have the best chance of defeating the CCF/NDP.”
http://esask.uregina.ca/entry/.....hewan.html
When the CCF – the socialist forerunners of the present NDP party - took office in 1944 what was the rate of population growth in Saskatchewan and, what was Saskatchewan’s population some 60 years later?
In 1941 Saskatchewan’s population was counted as 895,992 [wikipedia] and it was counted as 925,181 the year after Douglas left office - in 1960. There was a median gain of 29,189 people - during ‘five’ successive Douglas government terms.
Then later in 2006 – after nearly six decades of socialist governance - Saskatchewan essentially ended up as a ‘have-not’ province and - the population was recorded as 984,386.
Thus we have a median gain of 88,394 people to this province - in six decades of NDP socialist governance's!
So as noted in that quote from the Encyclopedia of Saskatchewan – the last 6 decades of governance have been mostly ‘dominated’ by the CCF/NDP…thankfully - there was a real breakaway – in 2006!
Incidentally - what was the population of Saskatchewan counted as in 2011?
The reasonable estimates are 1,057,884 – taken from the 2006 count of 984,386 - there is a median gain of 73,498 people.
What does that matter? I advance the thought that under the NDP’s flawed socialist model not only has Saskatchewan failed to thrive – it languished!
After just four years of a fresh approach - through the Saskatchewan Party - we have seen a surge of Saskatchewan’s population and - significant economic growth. Just saying…. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don't vote NDP not in Saskatchewan nor anywhere not now nor anytime!
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here is a good advertisement for the NDP and the election - I like this "Socialist Poster Boy" animation:
What if this surreptitious hardware were outwardly visible and the State were openly inducing it on whomever they chose...for whatever 'undisclosed' reasons they chose...would it then become a public outrage...but if it's only one individual and...the hardware is hidden away from sight...?
SATURDAY NOVEMBER 05, 2011 - TODAY IT'S 113 MONTHS TO THE DAY - WITH THIS "IMPLANT" WITHIN MY SINUS...! |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm so looking forward to the 'tangible result' of today's election - the NDP's defeat shall at last be 'sealed' - across the board!!
We've reached an era in this province where a point of 'no-return' has impressed itself upon enough voters.
No doubt this re-election of the Saskatchewan Party shall send a message to the meddlesome NDP and their micro'mis'management program for Saskatchewan.
Under the present government, Saskatchewan is at last moving forward - while the NDP wish only to keep the people of Saskatchewan shackled to the NDP'S failed past...today the NDP itself shall become 'the past'. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Good to see that the NDP have been defeated by the people of Saskatchewan...people with a taste of 'moving forward' and - they've sent a resounding message to the NDP today - we shall not return this province to the NDP's failed programs.
I couldn't be more happy to see the NDP trounced today - especially their latest leader - losing his seat! He's stepping down too! He has no staying power!
This result is a clear message to the NDP - from a great enough segment of the population of Saskatchewan: no more social, economic and political micromanagement!
I looked forward to the day that the Sask Party deservedly displaced the NDP oligarchy which had this province in a kind of inertia - a defeatist stranglehold - that displacement happened four years ago and - it has been thoroughly reconfirmed today.
My MLA is no longer an NDP, she didn't deserve that seat.
I also see that Frank Quennell [the former NDP in-justice minister] has lost his seat too! At last all the former NDP justice ministers having held office since this SGI nightmare began in 1998 - are out of public life!
I'm convinced that the Sask Party government shall do the right thing and resolve this longstanding rights abuse case...I just know they are not like the NDP...Seeing the NDP are the 'cause' of my rights abuse case naturally - I'm relieved and pleased to see them 'further' distanced from governance... |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I posted this on a topic on Premier Brad Wall's Facebook wall:
I posted this here on this topic - on Monday @ 7:07 PM:
"Rest assured your massive majority shall materialize very shortly! It's deserved."
So I guess when your government gains ground to reach 64.5% of the popular vote - greater than the Douglas and any other government in Saskatchewan's history - we could call that a "massive majority" couldn't we! Like I noted - it's deserved!
As is well known, I have been protesting/boycotting the NDP since before 2006 - six years. Actually the boycotting began in 1999 following an unfair experience with SGI.
The NDP never once tried to resolve any of the issues - instead they gave free reign to SGI and later in 2002 - my rights were seriously violated. Naturally there was never to be any sincerity in the NDP's handling of the matter. Thus by 2006 I had to create a full-out campaign against the NDP [and SGI] .
In any case I have spoken to thousands of people over these six years and - I have handed out hundreds of pamphlets as well - I have also maintained a strong online protest.
The NDP and their flawed programs are the cause of the [as yet to be resolved] human rights issues that I 'm enduring.
I've always held in my heart the unquestioned 'knowing' that one day the NDP would be fully trounced - so displaced from government that they would know full defeat - as the group of meddlesome hypocrites they operate as - that their feigned reputation of "for the people" would be revealed for what is really is - the scourge of Saskatchewan.
I know that reads very tersely but the truth is the truth...
So while this is a victory for you and your qualified government - I also like to think that my efforts over the years to protest the NDP - also contributed to some of the "NO" to the NDP votes.
Their defeat brings me a sense of relief and I relish in the fact that the Saskatchewan party and it's leader have become more popular than the NDP's greatest personality!
That forebodes true change in the thinking of Saskatchewan's people...
______________
I also posted other stuff as well and it wasn't deleted! Of course anything I posted to the NDP wall and to their now 'former' leader's wall ended up deleted!
They didn't like that I was 'rubbing it in' - the sheer irony of their "massive" defeat!
I do believe in the Brad Wall government and as I have noted within this topic in the past - I do believe that they will at last do the right thing and grant proper closure on these matters! |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 16, 2011 8:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I see today this topic has clicked over 54000 views! That is awesome and I so appreciate this website and it creators! I think in the blogging sense this topic is going viral.... |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sask. NDP party picks new interim leader
"Its official: John Nilson is the acting leader of the Saskatchewan NDP.
He is the longest serving MLA in the NDP caucus, going on 17 years. ..."
http://regina.ctv.ca/servlet/a.....hub=Regina
Oh I was mistaken when I stated that all the former NDP justice minister's were out of office - there is one left in office - John Nilson.
It should be noted that Nilson - along with having served as justice minister - has held a number of other portfolios within former NDP cabinets - including minister ("not") responsible for SGI. Naturally, as such, he figures into the rights violations mess related within the pages of this topic...
If John Nilson is the best public face the NDP can put on right now - it would seem that...in the aftermath of a historic defeat - the NDP are in worse shape than they realize!
Or you can view it without scrolling the image:
http://img42.imageshack.us/img.....ality2.jpg
Last edited by don muntean on Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:53 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2011 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well this boycott has to take another approach - as the dentist conscripted into the June 05, 2002 procedure - has become complacent in this boycott.
Dr. Falconer and - the [now previous] owner of Cathedral Dental Center have had over 6 years to bring proper closure to this matter, I have given extensive opportunities to do this - I even re-offered complete legal immunity to Dr. Falconer and still she chooses to evade this matter.
Thus, since I do not live in Regina and I cannot physically protest at the Wascana Clinic - I have little choice but to use a phone campaign - to call and remind her office - often - that this matter has gone on long enough and that the dentist can bring it to just closure - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - to resolve the matter...."the squeaky wheel".
Naturally, these calls are not harassment. It should be noted that on the point of 'telephone harassment' s. 372(3) of the Criminal Code uses specific language:
"Every one who, without lawful excuse and with intent to harass any person, makes or causes to be made repeated telephone calls to that person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction."
A specific 'defense' wording is there for a reason. The language of the Code contemplates that there are times an individual might indeed have a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" to another individual/business.
I assert that, under 'these' circumstances, one could reasonably argue having a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" - in connection to a boycott of this business - for a resolution of this outstanding and 'irregular' June 05, 2002 incident.
Further, the consideration of such a legitimate defense comes with application of mens rea, which is a legal concept surrounding 'state of mind' or in other-words 'intent'.
Of course, such so-called "repeated telephone calls" - as part of a boycott are not intended to "harass" - nor even to "alarm or annoy" her and/or her office!
I DO NOT LIKE MAKING THESE CALLS - AS I HAVE NO DESIRE TO COMMUNICATE WITH THIS DENTIST - I SINCERELY WANT TO FORGET ABOUT THIS DENTIST...BUT NOT BEFORE THIS DENTIST TAKES CARE OF HER RESPONSIBILITIES IN THIS MATTER.
I SHOULDN’T HAVE HAD TO ENDURE ‘ANY’ OF THIS – EVEN NOW – I HOPE THAT AT LAST THE NOTED 'AGENCY' SHALL CONTACT ME AND - HONORABLY - SETTLE/RESOLVE THIS LONG-SUFFERING MATTER. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| don muntean wrote: | Well this boycott has to take another approach - as the dentist conscripted into the June 05, 2002 procedure - has become complacent in this boycott.
Dr. Falconer and - the [now previous] owner of Cathedral Dental Center have had over 6 years to bring proper closure to this matter, I have given extensive opportunities to do this - I even re-offered complete legal immunity to Dr. Falconer and still she chooses to evade this matter.
Thus, since I do not live in Regina and I cannot physically protest at the Wascana Clinic - I have little choice but to use a phone campaign - to call and remind her office - often - that this matter has gone on long enough and that the dentist can bring it to just closure - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - to resolve the matter...."the squeaky wheel".
Naturally, these calls are not harassment. It should be noted that on the point of 'telephone harassment' s. 372(3) of the Criminal Code uses specific language:
"Every one who, without lawful excuse and with intent to harass any person, makes or causes to be made repeated telephone calls to that person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction."
A specific 'defense' wording is there for a reason. The language of the Code contemplates that there are times an individual might indeed have a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" to another individual/business.
I assert that, under 'these' circumstances, one could reasonably argue having a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" - in connection to a boycott of this business - for a resolution of this outstanding and 'irregular' June 05, 2002 incident.
Further, the consideration of such a legitimate defense comes with application of mens rea, which is a legal concept surrounding 'state of mind' or in other-words 'intent'.
Of course, such so-called "repeated telephone calls" - as part of a boycott are not intended to "harass" - nor even to "alarm or annoy" her and/or her office!
I DO NOT LIKE MAKING THESE CALLS - AS I HAVE NO DESIRE TO COMMUNICATE WITH THIS DENTIST - I SINCERELY WANT TO FORGET ABOUT THIS DENTIST...BUT NOT BEFORE THIS DENTIST TAKES CARE OF HER RESPONSIBILITIES IN THIS MATTER.
I SHOULDN’T HAVE HAD TO ENDURE ‘ANY’ OF THIS – EVEN NOW – I HOPE THAT AT LAST THE NOTED 'AGENCY' SHALL CONTACT ME AND - HONORABLY - SETTLE/RESOLVE THIS LONG-SUFFERING MATTER. |
So today...December 05, 2011...is now 114 months, that is - nine and a half years - to the day - since I lost my rights and privacy - on June 05, 2002.
That is 114 months!!
As I noted in this posting:
"since I do not live in Regina and I cannot physically protest at the Wascana Clinic - I have little choice but to use a phone campaign - to call and remind her office - often - that this matter has gone on long enough and that the dentist can bring it to just closure - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - to resolve the matter."
I have been doing just that and obviously since I haven't heard word of resolution - I have to continue to call 'often' enough - to pressure the dentist to deal with the matter responsibly. Isn't that generally the point of protests and boycotts?
I would like to thank the police for understanding my section 372(3) defense in this matter and for thus not interfering with my right to conduct such an extended boycott. They are quite aware that the intent isn't harassment and I would be more than happy to NOT call ever again - once this unparalleled matter is resolved.
I really really do NOT like making these calls and I shouldn't have to make them - yet - what alternatives have I been left with?
After living with this abuse of my rights - for 9.5 years - I'm seriously sick of the entire matter and - I hope that the dentist shall indeed do what she has to - deflect the entire matter once and for all - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - pressuring the agency: to resolve the matter.
In any event - nine and a half years - is a very long time... |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I have learned that it's always better - to make compromises - in order to bring the past to full closure - I'm in a mood of conciliatory compromise...where it comes to that well-known June 05, 2002 matter. I hope that 'the circumstances' will at last meet me half way... |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| don muntean wrote: | | don muntean wrote: | Well this boycott has to take another approach - as the dentist conscripted into the June 05, 2002 procedure - has become complacent in this boycott.
Dr. Falconer and - the [now previous] owner of Cathedral Dental Center have had over 6 years to bring proper closure to this matter, I have given extensive opportunities to do this - I even re-offered complete legal immunity to Dr. Falconer and still she chooses to evade this matter.
Thus, since I do not live in Regina and I cannot physically protest at the Wascana Clinic - I have little choice but to use a phone campaign - to call and remind her office - often - that this matter has gone on long enough and that the dentist can bring it to just closure - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - to resolve the matter...."the squeaky wheel".
Naturally, these calls are not harassment. It should be noted that on the point of 'telephone harassment' s. 372(3) of the Criminal Code uses specific language:
"Every one who, without lawful excuse and with intent to harass any person, makes or causes to be made repeated telephone calls to that person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction."
A specific 'defense' wording is there for a reason. The language of the Code contemplates that there are times an individual might indeed have a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" to another individual/business.
I assert that, under 'these' circumstances, one could reasonably argue having a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" - in connection to a boycott of this business - for a resolution of this outstanding and 'irregular' June 05, 2002 incident.
Further, the consideration of such a legitimate defense comes with application of mens rea, which is a legal concept surrounding 'state of mind' or in other-words 'intent'.
Of course, such so-called "repeated telephone calls" - as part of a boycott are not intended to "harass" - nor even to "alarm or annoy" her and/or her office!
I DO NOT LIKE MAKING THESE CALLS - AS I HAVE NO DESIRE TO COMMUNICATE WITH THIS DENTIST - I SINCERELY WANT TO FORGET ABOUT THIS DENTIST...BUT NOT BEFORE THIS DENTIST TAKES CARE OF HER RESPONSIBILITIES IN THIS MATTER.
I SHOULDN’T HAVE HAD TO ENDURE ‘ANY’ OF THIS – EVEN NOW – I HOPE THAT AT LAST THE NOTED 'AGENCY' SHALL CONTACT ME AND - HONORABLY - SETTLE/RESOLVE THIS LONG-SUFFERING MATTER. |
So today...December 05, 2011...is now 114 months, that is - nine and a half years - to the day - since I lost my rights and privacy - on June 05, 2002.
That is 114 months!!
As I noted in this posting:
"since I do not live in Regina and I cannot physically protest at the Wascana Clinic - I have little choice but to use a phone campaign - to call and remind her office - often - that this matter has gone on long enough and that the dentist can bring it to just closure - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - to resolve the matter."
I have been doing just that and obviously since I haven't heard word of resolution - I have to continue to call 'often' enough - to pressure the dentist to deal with the matter responsibly. Isn't that generally the point of protests and boycotts?
I would like to thank the police for understanding my section 372(3) defense in this matter and for thus not interfering with my right to conduct such an extended boycott. They are quite aware that the intent isn't harassment and I would be more than happy to NOT call ever again - once this unparalleled matter is resolved.
I really really do NOT like making these calls and I shouldn't have to make them - yet - what alternatives have I been left with?
After living with this abuse of my rights - for 9.5 years - I'm seriously sick of the entire matter and - I hope that the dentist shall indeed do what she has to - deflect the entire matter once and for all - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - pressuring the agency: to resolve the matter.
In any event - nine and a half years - is a very long time... |
So interestingly, when I again called 'the clinic' today and asked if they have yet contacted the "responsible agency" - reception stated ([before the standard hang up) "you're not worth it" - sad isn't it. It seems to have been a vain attempt to bait me - so that I would call back 'angry' - well that didn't happen. I won't become angry and I won't make 'angry calls'. I'm beyond that...
Of course, at some point, this legitimate 'extended' boycott won't be ignored by her - this boycott isn't about 'me' - it's about this dentist's responsibility, I'm sure in her mind I'm "not worth" ending this boycott properly - yet it's her reputation and her dental practice that she must consider as being "worth it"
I would like to AGAIN thank the police for understanding my section 372(3) defense in this matter and for thus not interfering with my right to conduct such an extended boycott. They are quite aware that the intent isn't harassment and I would be more than happy to NOT call ever again - once this unparalleled matter is resolved. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 09, 2011 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| don muntean wrote: | | don muntean wrote: | | don muntean wrote: | Well this boycott has to take another approach - as the dentist conscripted into the June 05, 2002 procedure - has become complacent in this boycott.
Dr. Falconer and - the [now previous] owner of Cathedral Dental Center have had over 6 years to bring proper closure to this matter, I have given extensive opportunities to do this - I even re-offered complete legal immunity to Dr. Falconer and still she chooses to evade this matter.
Thus, since I do not live in Regina and I cannot physically protest at the Wascana Clinic - I have little choice but to use a phone campaign - to call and remind her office - often - that this matter has gone on long enough and that the dentist can bring it to just closure - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - to resolve the matter...."the squeaky wheel".
Naturally, these calls are not harassment. It should be noted that on the point of 'telephone harassment' s. 372(3) of the Criminal Code uses specific language:
"Every one who, without lawful excuse and with intent to harass any person, makes or causes to be made repeated telephone calls to that person is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction."
A specific 'defense' wording is there for a reason. The language of the Code contemplates that there are times an individual might indeed have a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" to another individual/business.
I assert that, under 'these' circumstances, one could reasonably argue having a "lawful excuse" to make "repeated telephone calls" - in connection to a boycott of this business - for a resolution of this outstanding and 'irregular' June 05, 2002 incident.
Further, the consideration of such a legitimate defense comes with application of mens rea, which is a legal concept surrounding 'state of mind' or in other-words 'intent'.
Of course, such so-called "repeated telephone calls" - as part of a boycott are not intended to "harass" - nor even to "alarm or annoy" her and/or her office!
I DO NOT LIKE MAKING THESE CALLS - AS I HAVE NO DESIRE TO COMMUNICATE WITH THIS DENTIST - I SINCERELY WANT TO FORGET ABOUT THIS DENTIST...BUT NOT BEFORE THIS DENTIST TAKES CARE OF HER RESPONSIBILITIES IN THIS MATTER.
I SHOULDN’T HAVE HAD TO ENDURE ‘ANY’ OF THIS – EVEN NOW – I HOPE THAT AT LAST THE NOTED 'AGENCY' SHALL CONTACT ME AND - HONORABLY - SETTLE/RESOLVE THIS LONG-SUFFERING MATTER. |
So today...December 05, 2011...is now 114 months, that is - nine and a half years - to the day - since I lost my rights and privacy - on June 05, 2002.
That is 114 months!!
As I noted in this posting:
"since I do not live in Regina and I cannot physically protest at the Wascana Clinic - I have little choice but to use a phone campaign - to call and remind her office - often - that this matter has gone on long enough and that the dentist can bring it to just closure - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - to resolve the matter."
I have been doing just that and obviously since I haven't heard word of resolution - I have to continue to call 'often' enough - to pressure the dentist to deal with the matter responsibly. Isn't that generally the point of protests and boycotts?
I would like to thank the police for understanding my section 372(3) defense in this matter and for thus not interfering with my right to conduct such an extended boycott. They are quite aware that the intent isn't harassment and I would be more than happy to NOT call ever again - once this unparalleled matter is resolved.
I really really do NOT like making these calls and I shouldn't have to make them - yet - what alternatives have I been left with?
After living with this abuse of my rights - for 9.5 years - I'm seriously sick of the entire matter and - I hope that the dentist shall indeed do what she has to - deflect the entire matter once and for all - by pressuring the agency who conscripted her services on June 05, 2002 - pressuring the agency: to resolve the matter.
In any event - nine and a half years - is a very long time... |
So interestingly, when I again called 'the clinic' today and asked if they have yet contacted the "responsible agency" - reception stated ([before the standard hang up) "you're not worth it" - sad isn't it. It seems to have been a vain attempt to bait me - so that I would call back 'angry' - well that didn't happen. I won't become angry and I won't make 'angry calls'. I'm beyond that...
Of course, at some point, this legitimate 'extended' boycott won't be ignored by her - this boycott isn't about 'me' - it's about this dentist's responsibility, I'm sure in her mind I'm "not worth" ending this boycott properly - yet it's her reputation and her dental practice that she must consider as being "worth it"
I would like to AGAIN thank the police for understanding my section 372(3) defense in this matter and for thus not interfering with my right to conduct such an extended boycott. They are quite aware that the intent isn't harassment and I would be more than happy to NOT call ever again - once this unparalleled matter is resolved. |
So the daily calling to this dentist - to BEG for my rights - continues to fall onto deaf ears - I just cannot believe that any Canadian has to go through what I'm going through. If ANYONE thinks I will just give it up and walk away - they're not thinking clearly - NO ONE walks away from anything as bad as this and - I won't be.
The calls are NOT harassment NOT intimidation - they are ONLY meant to URGE Dr. Falconer to CONTACT the AGENCY RESPONSIBLE already and have them resolve it - there is NO OTHER intent in these calls.
I do not yell, I do not call names, I do not use profanity - I'm only making respectful [under these circumstances] and assertive calls. I have no inclination to anger - what good would that do? I was FAR angrier five years ago and - I never crossed any lines!
Someone might ask why do I have to call so often? I ask - where is the legitimate result?
Dr. Falconer has EVADED every attempt to resolve this...how long can she ignore the 'interruption' of her dental practice?
I would like to AGAIN thank the police for understanding my section 372(3) defense in this matter and for thus not interfering with my right to conduct such an extended boycott.
I'm heartened by the fact that there are SOME AGENCIES THAT RESPECT LEGAL AND CIVIL RIGHTS!
The police are quite aware that my intent isn't harassment/intimidation and I would be more than happy to NOT call ever again - once this unparalleled matter is resolved.
I do have faith that the matter can and shall be resolved and - that's that! |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 23 of 30
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB |
|
