Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds


CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect



Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 5 of 5
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
crazymamma





Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 1011
Reputation: 71.8
votes: 14
Location: The kitchen

PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fiscalconservative wrote:

Up until recently the Democrats have worked under the "can't hit a gurl" rule and not said much at all.


AS if the predominately left wing MSM doesn't speak their message as instructed.


I wanna know what sort of recreational mood/reality enhancers you partake in.
fiscalconservative





Joined: 08 Dec 2008
Posts: 1043
Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9
votes: 6

PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 2:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

crazymamma wrote:
fiscalconservative wrote:

Up until recently the Democrats have worked under the "can't hit a gurl" rule and not said much at all.


AS if the predominately left wing MSM doesn't speak their message as instructed.


I wanna know what sort of recreational mood/reality enhancers you partake in.


No, the MSM does not speak the message its instructed. Its memebers are certainly biased, but there is no organized conspiracy run out of Ed Asner's basement.

The MSM was not that hard on her either. Kathleen Parker (National Review) refered to Palin as "out of her league", that is language above what almost all MSM outlets produced.

But my point was the mainstream Democratic Party. Go look at what they did to Dan Quayle. You saw none of that against Palin, Biden didn't even correct her mistakes during the debate. If there is any leader who screams for a personal attack ad, its Palin.

The point was Palin was huring the Republicans more than she was hurting the Democrats and they only way the Democrats could screw it up was to make it look like they were attacking a soccer mom.

The only really nasty attacks she faced were from some fringe blogs.
crazymamma





Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 1011
Reputation: 71.8
votes: 14
Location: The kitchen

PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2009 5:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dude, Ed Asner's basement?


Maybe it was out of media Czar Les Nessman's taped off cubical?
kwlafayette





Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 6155
Reputation: 156.2Reputation: 156.2
votes: 28
Location: Saskatoon Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fiscalconservative wrote:
kwlafayette wrote:
Um, there is no point crazymamma. Hating Sarah Palin has nothing to do with his brain, it is an article of his religious faith; liberalism. The high priests of liberalism have declared a fatwah against Sarah Palin, and all true believers must hate her, it is just that simple.

Might as well stop wasting our time, and simply get back to the issue at hand.


The fact that you again ignore is most of the nasty comments about Palin has come from consevative camp. The National Review for example. Up until recently the Democrats have worked under the "can't hit a gurl" rule and not said much at all. They are still hoping for their wet dream of seeing Palin on the 2012 ticket. Palin's numbers right now area almost the same as Qualye's were after he cost the first Bush the election. How did Qualye's POTUS bid turn out ?
Most people who call themselves conservatives these days actually aren't. David Frum formerly of national review is an excellent example of this phenom.

Most US conservatives would rather idolize Kennedy than Nixon. Most Canadian Conservatives think more of Paul Martin than they do of Mulroney or Diefenbaker.

Yeah, those Hillary nutcrackers were definitely a solid "can't hit a girl". Why, if you looked up the definition of "can't hit a girl" in the dictionary, you would probably find some effigies of Condi Rice, and pictures of the Hillary nutcrackers.
fiscalconservative





Joined: 08 Dec 2008
Posts: 1043
Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9
votes: 6

PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kwlafayette wrote:
fiscalconservative wrote:
kwlafayette wrote:
Um, there is no point crazymamma. Hating Sarah Palin has nothing to do with his brain, it is an article of his religious faith; liberalism. The high priests of liberalism have declared a fatwah against Sarah Palin, and all true believers must hate her, it is just that simple.

Might as well stop wasting our time, and simply get back to the issue at hand.


The fact that you again ignore is most of the nasty comments about Palin has come from consevative camp. The National Review for example. Up until recently the Democrats have worked under the "can't hit a gurl" rule and not said much at all. They are still hoping for their wet dream of seeing Palin on the 2012 ticket. Palin's numbers right now area almost the same as Qualye's were after he cost the first Bush the election. How did Qualye's POTUS bid turn out ?
Most people who call themselves conservatives these days actually aren't. David Frum formerly of national review is an excellent example of this phenom.

Most US conservatives would rather idolize Kennedy than Nixon. Most Canadian Conservatives think more of Paul Martin than they do of Mulroney or Diefenbaker.

Yeah, those Hillary nutcrackers were definitely a solid "can't hit a girl". Why, if you looked up the definition of "can't hit a girl" in the dictionary, you would probably find some effigies of Condi Rice, and pictures of the Hillary nutcrackers.


Yeah, yeah, you don't think Frum is a "real" conservative. The problem is Palin's critics are not just Frum. George Will, Kathleen Parker, the head of the Republican Senatorial commitee, senior Republican leaders in Alaska, her debate coach, lots of people inside McCain's camp.

Now, you may say they are not really Republicans either....but if think you can win an election without the votes of George Will, Kathleen Parker, or even Frum, they you are crazy.
fiscalconservative





Joined: 08 Dec 2008
Posts: 1043
Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9
votes: 6

PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

crazymamma wrote:
Dude, Ed Asner's basement?


Maybe it was out of media Czar Les Nessman's taped off cubical?


Les Nessman was a conservative! (he would have made a better VP candidate too)
crazymamma





Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 1011
Reputation: 71.8
votes: 14
Location: The kitchen

PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 11:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

fiscalconservative wrote:
crazymamma wrote:
Dude, Ed Asner's basement?


Maybe it was out of media Czar Les Nessman's taped off cubical?


Les Nessman was a conservative! (he would have made a better VP candidate too)


You got me there, a trained flea would have been an improvement over JB.
fiscalconservative





Joined: 08 Dec 2008
Posts: 1043
Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9Reputation: 49.9
votes: 6

PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

crazymamma wrote:
fiscalconservative wrote:
crazymamma wrote:
Dude, Ed Asner's basement?


Maybe it was out of media Czar Les Nessman's taped off cubical?


Les Nessman was a conservative! (he would have made a better VP candidate too)


You got me there, a trained flea would have been an improvement over JB.


I would rate his slightly above a trained flee ...he beat Palin after all.
kwlafayette





Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 6155
Reputation: 156.2Reputation: 156.2
votes: 28
Location: Saskatoon Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.realclearpolitics.c.....98112.html

Anyone care to admit how massively wrong there were? Or are you still convinced that if you have a car accident, this won't affect your care? Actually, don't bother, I pretty much know your answer already.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 5 of 5

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


I need some help here.

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB