Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds


CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect



  

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cbasu





Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 391
Reputation: 131.3
votes: 2

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:21 pm    Post subject: Why pick on PMO staffers? Reply with quote

Conservative supporters will remember how the opposition - Liberals, in particular - savaged the Calgary associates of PM Harper in the last two federal elections. Tom Flanagan seemed to take the lion's share of the blows, with groups ranging from First Nations groups to the NDP portraying him as some sort of political troglodyte.

Now, the attention has shifted to PMO Chief of Staff Ian Brodie and Deputy Chief Patrick Muttart. Not satisfied with the non-story behind PM Harper's trip to see the opening of the NHL season or the NS Tory convention - costs for which were apparently borne by the party - the trip taken by Brodie, Burney and others back in early March '07 to Washington has been the focus of at least two newspaper writeups recently.

In a (subscription only) article entitled "Tories won't release names of passengers on DND plane", a big deal is made of the fact that Mr. Brodie did not disclose any of his meal expenses or that the trip even took place.

Transition chief Burney, Mr. Brodie's EA Cardow, and Muttart were apparently also on the trip. While there must be a simple explanation, the article fails to describe why Mr. Muttart would need to stay overnight in Washington - thus costing the taxpayers close to $1500 - and not return with the others on the same day.

What I fail to understand - or accept - is why anonymous staffers get caught in the political crossfire. Most of them work extremely hard for not much pay.

Elected officials are probably fair game, but why pick on the staffers?


Last edited by cbasu on Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:31 pm; edited 3 times in total
Cool Blue





Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 3130
Reputation: 114.9
votes: 10
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If the expenses were paid by the party, why do we care?
cbasu





Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 391
Reputation: 131.3
votes: 2

PostPosted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cool Blue wrote:
If the expenses were paid by the party, why do we care?

One would expect a normal answer to be "we do not", until you ask the question "but, how much do the trips really cost?".

To wit:

In an Oct 28/06 CP/Star article entitled 'PM's trips tallied up' Bruce Cheadle wrote:
(abridged) .. Buckler said the reimbursements for the two flights one to Halifax last February, another to Toronto on Oct. 4 were calculated by using average commercial rates for the same trip on the same day.

The Defence Department, meanwhile, said yesterday it has been ordered "by the powers that be" not to divulge the exact cost of the flights, but did provide general operating costs...

Now, it becomes a story about accountability and transparency. There must be an election coming.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

  


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Why pick on PMO staffers?

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB