Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds


CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect



  

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
truth4freedom





Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 255
Reputation: 23.7Reputation: 23.7
votes: 3
Location: Bible Belt USA!

PostPosted: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:02 pm    Post subject: Dozens of Peer Reviewed Works Refuting CO2 Global Warming Reply with quote

I found these today. What a gem. Part I, Part II. Part III will hopefully follow. Excellent resource!
Mac





Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 5500
Reputation: 104
votes: 35
Location: John Baird's riding...

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2008 6:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It doesn't matter. The debate is done. Evidence is double-plus irrelevant. :roll:

-Mac
kwlafayette





Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 6155
Reputation: 156.2Reputation: 156.2
votes: 28
Location: Saskatoon Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That would be double plus un-relevant. Your newspeak error leads me to believe that you may be committing thought crime.
FascistLibertarian





Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 1092
Reputation: 30.1Reputation: 30.1Reputation: 30.1
votes: 14
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ExxonMobil = largest donar to heartland institute.
truth4freedom





Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 255
Reputation: 23.7Reputation: 23.7
votes: 3
Location: Bible Belt USA!

PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FascistLibertarian wrote:
ExxonMobil = largest donar to heartland institute.


What part of peer reviewed escaped you? The validity of the research has nothing to do with who does or does not support it. This is the problem today. One cannot have an intelligent debate when someone insists on attempting to refute evidence based on sources and not facts.
FascistLibertarian





Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 1092
Reputation: 30.1Reputation: 30.1Reputation: 30.1
votes: 14
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How many of these papers were published outside of their field compared to paleoclimate journals? How many of them were reviewed by people who arent qualified to do so? What agendas do the reviewers or the editors have? How many articles does the journal publish? How many articles are published supporting global warming?
DM Schwartz





Joined: 08 Sep 2006
Posts: 45
Reputation: 34.4Reputation: 34.4Reputation: 34.4

PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FascistLibertarian wrote:
How many of these papers were published outside of their field compared to paleoclimate journals? How many of them were reviewed by people who arent qualified to do so? What agendas do the reviewers or the editors have? How many articles does the journal publish? How many articles are published supporting global warming?


Look at the articles, they show where the peer reviewed papers are published....Nature, Geophysical Research Letters, Climate Research, Energy & Environment, Journal of Climate, etc.....pretty relevant I'd say. How many articles are published supporting global warming is irrelevant to the topic of the post which is that there are peer reviewed papers that contradict global warming alarmism.

Also, the ExxonMobil = largest donar to heartland institute is just plain ad hominen rubbish.
kwlafayette





Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 6155
Reputation: 156.2Reputation: 156.2
votes: 28
Location: Saskatoon Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FascistLibertarian wrote:
ExxonMobil = largest donar to heartland institute.

This is a logical fallacy. What FL is saying here, is that attacking the messenger is sufficient (ad hominem), while the argument itself is left alone.

Turn it around. Al Gore stands to make millions of the whole carbon offset/green industry, therefor nothing he clains could possible be correct. There, entire theory of man made climate change debunked. No need for further discussion.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

  


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Dozens of Peer Reviewed Works Refuting CO2 Global Warming

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB