Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds

CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect


Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:10 pm    Post subject: The 'Take It Easy' Candidates Reply with quote

The 'Take It Easy' Candidates
Huckabee and Obama.

by Fred Barnes
12/25/2007 12:00:00 AM

THE POPULAR NOTION about Barack Obama and Mike Huckabee is that they're soaring in the 2008 presidential race because they're candidates of change. And indeed that's true. But it's a particular kind of change that is key to their appeal. They might be called the "take it easy" candidates.

There's a certain amount of nostalgia in their message, too. They would like to return America to a more tranquil time when the country seemed less threatened--like the years between the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the 9/11 attacks in 2001--and when our politic culture was less combative.

And this points to an underlying theme in both the Obama and Huckabee campaigns. It's pretty simple: We can get along with the world and with each other. As a nation, we don't have to be tense and angry. We can take it easy.

Since he began his run for the Democratic nomination, Obama has emphasized his goal of ending the bitter fighting between Democrats and Republicans and forging bipartisan compromises. He promises to stop the polarization, the hyped-up political atmosphere, the nasty squabbling, the personal attacks--in short, all the stuff that millions of Americans hate about Washington.

His early opposition to the war in Iraq plays a role here. America, Obama suggests or at least implies, doesn't have to go off on crusades around the world. Nor do we have to be so furiously at odds with adversaries around the world that we insist on an arms-length, no-talking relationship. Obama says as president he would meet with anti-American leaders like President Amadinejad of Iran.

A Republican senator mockingly refers to Obama as "Senator Bring Us Together." But it's a talking point that Obama has been using effectively since his celebrated speech at the 2004 Democratic convention in Boston. Americans, he said then, can "pursue our individual dreams and yet still come together as one American family. E pluribus unum. Out of many, one."

Just this week, Obama is stressing this idea in his Christmas TV ad. Sitting with his wife and young daughters beside a Christmas tree and a fire, he repeats a line from his campaign speeches--and it seems quite appropriate in a Christmas holiday context. "The things that unite us as a people are more powerful and enduring than anything that sets us apart," he says.

Huckabee, the first candidate to air a Christmas message, makes a slightly different point in his ad. Politics isn't the most important thing in life, he indicates--a point campaign-weary residents of Iowa and New Hampshire no doubt agree with. At Christmas, Huckabee says, "what matters is the celebration of the birth of Christ."

From the beginning of his candidacy, Huckabee has promoted the idea that everyone needs to lighten up. He introduced himself in the early television debates among Republican presidential candidates this way: "I'm a conservative, but I'm not mad at anyone about it." Though a Republican, Huckabee has actually echoed Obama, a Democrat. In the Republican debate on December 11 in Des Moines, he said his top priority is to "bring the country back together."

In foreign affairs, Huckabee doesn't appear to be mad at anyone either. His policy for getting along with other nations is the Golden Rule. Be nice to other countries and they'll be nice to America. In other words, we can take it easy not just as a national attitude but also as a foreign policy."

Now, Obama and Huckabee have many detractors. Critics of Obama complain that he talks about bipartisanship but does little to pursue it. In his book, The Audacity of Hope, he praised the bipartisan "gang of 14" senators that got together on judicial nominations. But he declined to join them because they allowed conservative nominees to be confirmed.

With Huckabee, the charge is that he's na´ve on national security and as Arkansas governor wasn't very adept at bringing competing sides together. And despite his concern for "what matters" more than politics, Huckabee did a series of TV interviews the day before Christmas and scheduled five campaign events in Iowa the day after.

There's an obvious reason behind the attacks on Obama and Huckabee. They come from political opponents who wouldn't be complaining if the appeals of Obama and Huckabee to tone down the friction in politics and world affairs weren't working.

Fred Barnes is executive editor of THE WEEKLY STANDARD.

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1


Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

The 'Take It Easy' Candidates

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB