Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds


CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect



  

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kwlafayette





Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 6155
Reputation: 156.2Reputation: 156.2
votes: 28
Location: Saskatoon Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 2:01 am    Post subject: Maybe nothing but ... Reply with quote

I was watching the news the other night, and for the first time ever that I can remember, the Fraser institute was NOT identified as a right wing think tank. Simply as an economic think tank. I wonder if that means anything? I think it was the CTV website maybe, and the story was about training more doctors.
Donald Hughes





Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 166
Reputation: 16.2Reputation: 16.2
Location: Libertarian socialism

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 12:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would suspect it means little. Sometimes organizations with an obvious standpoint are treated as neutral when you don't want to do a large piece on them. For example, a report might come out that seems mildly newsworthy in itself, but they don't want to start getting into the deeper argument with other organizations and their positions. The other alternative is when you just want to give their view unfiltered. In this case, I think that it was just a standard "it bleeds, it leads" sort of thing where they always want to put stories out there about some health care crisis, and to make it newsworthy you can't undermine the importance of the story. I haven't thought enough about it, but I think that obsession in the news to make each story seem relevant and important probably distorts things much more than we assume. I mean, air pollution is a much bigger problem for Canada than terrorism of any sort, but it tends not to get comparable coverage.
Craig
Site Admin




Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 4415
Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8
votes: 36

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You will notice however that left wing institutes like Caledon are describe as "left leaning" while C.D. Howe and Frasier are "right wing". Subtle, but telling.
Stephen





Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 645
Reputation: 72.9
votes: 5
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Craig wrote:
You will notice however that left wing institutes like Caledon are describe as "left leaning" while C.D. Howe and Frasier are "right wing". Subtle, but telling.


In fairness, that might be selective hearing on your part. Probably not... but it might.

Someone should do a study. Do a Google news search for ---> right wing Fraser Institute

:D
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

  


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Maybe nothing but ...

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB