Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds


CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect



Goto page Previous  1, 2  

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 2 of 2
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mrsocko





Joined: 29 Oct 2006
Posts: 2463
Reputation: 131.2
votes: 8
Location: Southwestern Ontario

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
That's just it. It wasn't his company. The minute you take your company public it ceases to be yours. He acted like it was still his.


Yah, your right. I heard Trump criticize him for this. Trump said he would never take his company public cause it was to easy to get into trouble on perks and bonuses etc...
hamiltonguyo





Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 250
Reputation: 49.5Reputation: 49.5Reputation: 49.5Reputation: 49.5Reputation: 49.5

PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Point is if they didn't pay HIM himself the non-compete fees he could have skipped hollinger and made his own newspaper in the cities that hollinger sold off.

Theres nothing wrong with he did.
Craig
Site Admin




Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 4415
Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8
votes: 36

PostPosted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hamiltonguyo wrote:
The Point is if they didn't pay HIM himself the non-compete fees he could have skipped hollinger and made his own newspaper in the cities that hollinger sold off.

Theres nothing wrong with he did.


That doesn't have anything to do with it. He paid himself millions in perks and expenses through a company that no longer belonged to him. He then tried to hide it. He stole from the shareholders. Not signing a "non-compete" agreement is completely different and unrelated.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 2 of 2

Goto page Previous  1, 2  


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Conrad Black guilty

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB