The Point is if they didn't pay HIM himself the non-compete fees he could have skipped hollinger and made his own newspaper in the cities that hollinger sold off.
Theres nothing wrong with he did.
That doesn't have anything to do with it. He paid himself millions in perks and expenses through a company that no longer belonged to him. He then tried to hide it. He stole from the shareholders. Not signing a "non-compete" agreement is completely different and unrelated.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum