Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      

*NEW* Login or register using your Facebook account.

Not a member? Join the fastest growing conservative community!
Membership is free and takes 15 seconds


CLICK HERE or use Facebook to login or register ----> Connect



  

Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Craig
Site Admin




Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 4415
Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8
votes: 36

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 9:40 am    Post subject: London mayor defends Muslims as bomb plot foiled Reply with quote

Can you believe this?!?

Quote:
"In this city, Muslims are more likely to be law-abiding than non-Muslims and less likely to support the use of violence to achieve political ends than non-Muslims," he told BBC Radio.

"They have played a good and active and growing role in creating a multi-cultural society," he added.

He noted that terrorist acts had been carried out in London over the years by various groups including for example far-right groups. For years the British capital was wracked by violence by the Irish Republican Army (IRA).

"All I am interested in as mayor is that we try to prevent all acts of violence whether it is by a disaffected young member of the (far-right) BNP (British National Party), whether it is by an Islamist or a Wahhabist supporter," he said.


http://uk.news.yahoo.com/afp/2.....ad41d.html

Quote:
LONDON, Sunday, July 1 — British officials raised the country’s terrorism threat alert to its highest level on Saturday after two men slammed an S.U.V. into entrance doors at Glasgow Airport and turned the vehicle into a potentially lethal fireball.

Less than 38 hours earlier the police uncovered two cars in London rigged to explode with gasoline, gas canisters and nails.

Early Sunday, after a day of fast-moving developments, the London police announced that two people had been arrested in Cheshire, in northwest England, “in connection with the events in London and Scotland.”

The arrests were in addition to those of the two occupants of the blazing car at Glasgow Airport. A witness to the attack said on BBC television that one of the car’s occupants had been ablaze from head to foot, and as he struggled with the police, “was throwing punches and shouting ‘Allah, Allah.’ ”
truth4freedom





Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 255
Reputation: 23.7Reputation: 23.7
votes: 3
Location: Bible Belt USA!

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 11:58 am    Post subject: Re: London mayor defends Muslims as bomb plot foiled Reply with quote

Craig wrote:
"In this city, Muslims are more likely to be law-abiding than non-Muslims and less likely to support the use of violence to achieve political ends than non-Muslims," he told BBC Radio.


What a load of crap. I would be interested to see the exact numbers, but anyone with a functioning brain can see that islam and violence go hand in hand. I hope this guy is not going to be the one to officially surrender London to islam.

Craig wrote:
"They have played a good and active and growing role in creating a multi-cultural society," he added.


He got that right. They are contributing to the spread of islam as a ruling world religion. What a coward!

Craig wrote:
He noted that terrorist acts had been carried out in London over the years by various groups including for example far-right groups. For years the British capital was wracked by violence by the Irish Republican Army (IRA).


Which is a non issue and has been for years. What a cop out...

Craig wrote:
"All I am interested in as mayor is that we try to prevent all acts of violence whether it is by a disaffected young member of the (far-right) BNP (British National Party), whether it is by an Islamist or a Wahhabist supporter," he said.


:roll: Surrender now and maybe they will let you keep your head.
Stephen





Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 645
Reputation: 72.9
votes: 5
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Red Ken has always been controversial:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_.....746016.stm
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/t.....714653.ece
PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One Word: Treason
Stephen





Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 645
Reputation: 72.9
votes: 5
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Remember, after 9/11 Bush said that Islam was the religion of peace and that it was not Islam or muslims that were responsible for 9/11, it was Osama bin Laden.

Political leaders call for this kind of calm after terrorist attacks so that people don't take matters into their own hands. Frankly, Bush and Red Ken said what they did so that angry mobs of idiots don't take vigilante justice against innocents based on race or religion.
Craig
Site Admin




Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 4415
Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8
votes: 36

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stephen wrote:
Remember, after 9/11 Bush said that Islam was the religion of peace and that it was not Islam or muslims that were responsible for 9/11, it was Osama bin Laden.

Political leaders call for this kind of calm after terrorist attacks so that people don't take matters into their own hands. Frankly, Bush and Red Ken said what they did so that angry mobs of idiots don't take vigilante justice against innocents based on race or religion.


Ken went a step further by suggesting that Muslims are MORE law-abiding than non-muslims.
Craig
Site Admin




Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 4415
Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8
votes: 36

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A question:

If Nazism was re-cast as a religion would it be okay to be a Nazi?
Stephen





Joined: 02 Sep 2006
Posts: 645
Reputation: 72.9
votes: 5
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Craig wrote:
Stephen wrote:
Remember, after 9/11 Bush said that Islam was the religion of peace and that it was not Islam or muslims that were responsible for 9/11, it was Osama bin Laden.

Political leaders call for this kind of calm after terrorist attacks so that people don't take matters into their own hands. Frankly, Bush and Red Ken said what they did so that angry mobs of idiots don't take vigilante justice against innocents based on race or religion.


Ken went a step further by suggesting that Muslims are MORE law-abiding than non-muslims.


Well, Red Ken has a style all his own and yes, his words are questionable most of the time. He did invite Chavez to London for a bizarre state-like dinner a few years ago. I'd never vote for the guy.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stephen wrote:
Remember, after 9/11 Bush said that Islam was the religion of peace and that it was not Islam or muslims that were responsible for 9/11, it was Osama bin Laden.

Political leaders call for this kind of calm after terrorist attacks so that people don't take matters into their own hands. Frankly, Bush and Red Ken said what they did so that angry mobs of idiots don't take vigilante justice against innocents based on race or religion.


And you think angry mobs are going to listen what Commie Ken says?
Craig
Site Admin




Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 4415
Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8
votes: 36

PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Winston2004 wrote:
Stephen wrote:
Remember, after 9/11 Bush said that Islam was the religion of peace and that it was not Islam or muslims that were responsible for 9/11, it was Osama bin Laden.

Political leaders call for this kind of calm after terrorist attacks so that people don't take matters into their own hands. Frankly, Bush and Red Ken said what they did so that angry mobs of idiots don't take vigilante justice against innocents based on race or religion.


And you think angry mobs are going to listen what Commie Ken says?


They did vote for him :?

The argument has long been made by centrists and socialists that we can't infringe on the rights of the moderates in order to ferret out the extremists. There has to be a breaking point however - a critical mass. At what point does the majority rights of the people to live in a safe and secure society outweight the marginal loss of rights applied to a minority? I think we are getting close.

If certain segments of society have been proven unable to co-exist then they shouldn't. Isn't that the point of having countries in the first place?
FascistLibertarian





Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 1092
Reputation: 30.1Reputation: 30.1Reputation: 30.1
votes: 14
Location: Ontario

PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What they do is a corruption of Islam.
Craig
Site Admin




Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 4415
Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8Reputation: 47.8
votes: 36

PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FascistLibertarian wrote:
What they do is a corruption of Islam.


Islam accomodates both. The Koran is clear about that.
truth4freedom





Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 255
Reputation: 23.7Reputation: 23.7
votes: 3
Location: Bible Belt USA!

PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FascistLibertarian wrote:
What they do is a corruption of Islam.


The slaughter of innocents is the fulfillment of islam, not the corruption of it.
don muntean





Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 2262
Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9Reputation: 34.9
votes: 8
Location: Saskatchewan

PostPosted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Craig wrote:
Winston2004 wrote:
Stephen wrote:
Remember, after 9/11 Bush said that Islam was the religion of peace and that it was not Islam or muslims that were responsible for 9/11, it was Osama bin Laden.

Political leaders call for this kind of calm after terrorist attacks so that people don't take matters into their own hands. Frankly, Bush and Red Ken said what they did so that angry mobs of idiots don't take vigilante justice against innocents based on race or religion.


And you think angry mobs are going to listen what Commie Ken says?



The argument has long been made by centrists and socialists that we can't infringe on the rights of the moderates in order to ferret out the extremists.


Of course the NDP socialists had no difficulty to infringe on my rights and - in a very invasive manner too and - they did this - because I became dissatisfied with their cheating 'insurance program'...when I complained and didn't take their "no" for a response.

If we look into the annals of history - it's leftists and socialists who became some of the worst to infringe on rights - yet - we're hard pressed to find the same 'record' with 'rightists'.

When shall people learn to never trust the left-wing - they veil their nonsense in so-called for the people programs - when in power - they don't govern - they build socialist infrastructures...which they ultimately use against the populace.

It's no secret that most islamists - are also socialists...
PostPosted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Craig wrote:
Winston2004 wrote:
Stephen wrote:
Remember, after 9/11 Bush said that Islam was the religion of peace and that it was not Islam or muslims that were responsible for 9/11, it was Osama bin Laden.

Political leaders call for this kind of calm after terrorist attacks so that people don't take matters into their own hands. Frankly, Bush and Red Ken said what they did so that angry mobs of idiots don't take vigilante justice against innocents based on race or religion.


And you think angry mobs are going to listen what Commie Ken says?


They did vote for him :?

The argument has long been made by centrists and socialists that we can't infringe on the rights of the moderates in order to ferret out the extremists. There has to be a breaking point however - a critical mass. At what point does the majority rights of the people to live in a safe and secure society outweight the marginal loss of rights applied to a minority? I think we are getting close.

If certain segments of society have been proven unable to co-exist then they shouldn't. Isn't that the point of having countries in the first place?


Those who want to kill us blend in with those who don't want to do so. It's a cancer and the cancer must be removed, IMO.
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1

  


 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


London mayor defends Muslims as bomb plot foiled

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB