Home FAQ Search Memberlist User Groups Register Login   

BloggingTories.ca Forum IndexBloggingTories.ca Forum Index
    Index     FAQ     Search     Register     Login         JOIN THE DISCUSSION - CLICK HERE      


Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 6549
Reputation: 304.4Reputation: 304.4
votes: 8

PostPosted: Sun Nov 19, 2017 1:57 am    Post subject: False Promises in climate change Reply with quote

Fróm a larger article by Lorrie Goldstein ... the foremost journalistic critic of the green energy plans. In this part of the article, Goldstein tries to give the reader a sense of the magnitude of the committments that Trudeau made in Canada's name -- not in megatonnes, but in terms that are more accessible to the ordinary person.

Goldstein: False promises in climate change goals

... The Trudeau government faces the same dilemma (as the Martin government).

The UN reported last month that for Trudeau to fulfill his 2015 Paris accord commitments to lower Canada’s emissions to 17% below 2005 levels by 2020 and to 30% by 2030, Canada will have to cut its emissions by 111 Mt annually by 2020 and 219 Mt annually by 2030.

To meet his 2020 commitment, Trudeau will have to shut down the equivalent of Canada’s entire electricity sector (79 Mt annually) and 44% of its agricultural sector (73 Mt annually) within three years.

To meet his 2030 commitment, Trudeau will have to shut down the equivalent of Canada’s entire transportation sector (173 Mt annually), plus its entire waste disposal sector (48 Mt annually) in 13 years.

Given that this is impossible, the last thing Trudeau, and Environment and Climate Change Minister Catherine McKenna want to talk about — as we saw last week at the UN’s Bonn climate summit — is their plan to reduce Canada’s emissions to the levels Trudeau promised the UN for 2020 and 2030.

That’s because they don’t have one.

Why do they impose such burdens on themselves, and ultimately, us? It's a good question, because, to the degree they fall short, they will have to buy carbon credits from some issuer of carbon credits. In other words, money will flow out of this country.

And, down the road, that means economic dislocation, job losses, and political problems.

Even if we achieved our goals by whatever draconian means imaginable, it won't make a bit of difference. China has ONE COMPANY that has a plan to build 700 coal-fired power plants in the next decade! Shanghai has a company that has contracted to build several more in Pakistan, Egypt, and Iran.

The thing is -- the top negotiators know this. Why, then, commit us to a lie?
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1


Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

False Promises in climate change

phpBBCopyright 2001, 2005 phpBB